Can a U.S. buyer bring a supply-contract claim in China? In Shaphargroup’s medical-glove dispute, Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People’s Court awarded nearly US$20,000 in actual damages at first instance in May 2023. A refund of over US$940,000 and interest were separate. The dispute involved quality issues with the first container and two further containers that were not delivered. For U.S. procurement teams, connect the contract, payments, quality objections and loss records. Separate money paid for the goods from additional damages. Later proceedings and collection have not been verified. Contact Comply to discuss your China-related dispute and coordinate next steps with counsel. #USProcurement #ChinaSourcing #MedicalGloves #CrossBorderContracts #Comply Case: Shaphargroup LLC v. Baiki Holdings (China), Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People’s Court, (2022) Jing 04 Min Chu 294, May 16, 2023. First instance; later proceedings and collection unverified. Original: https://www.uncitral.org/res/clout/clout/data/chn/clout_case__html/CHN_16052023_FT.pdf Music: Cipher by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com), ISRC USUAN1100844. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Public case commentary; not a claim that our office represented the parties. Generic glove and third-party office footage do not depict the goods or office in this case.

Claim in China In May 2023, Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People’s Court awarded U.S. buyer Shaphargroup nearly US$20,000 in actual damages at first instance over medical gloves. A refund of over US$940,000 and interest were separate. The first container had quality issues; two more were not delivered. Link contracts, payments, quality objections and loss records. Later proceedings and collection are unverified. Contact Comply about your China-related dispute. #USProcurement #ChinaSourcing #MedicalGloves #CrossBorderContracts #Comply https://www.uncitral.org/res/clout/clout/data/chn/clout_case__html/CHN_16052023_FT.pdf Illustrative footage; not case products or representation. Music: Cipher — Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com), CC BY 4.0. Excerpt; mix adjusted. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Claim in China In May 2023, Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People’s Court awarded U.S. buyer Shaphargroup nearly US$20,000 in actual damages at first instance over medical gloves. A refund of over US$940,000 and interest were separate. The first container had quality issues; two more were not delivered. Link contracts, payments, quality objections and loss records. Later proceedings and collection are unverified. Contact Comply about your China-related dispute. #USProcurement #ChinaSourcing #MedicalGloves #CrossBorderContracts #Comply https://www.uncitral.org/res/clout/clout/data/chn/clout_case__html/CHN_16052023_FT.pdf Illustrative footage; not case products or representation. Music: Cipher — Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com), CC BY 4.0. Excerpt; mix adjusted. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Claim in China In May 2023, Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People’s Court awarded U.S. buyer Shaphargroup nearly US$20,000 in actual damages at first instance over medical gloves. A refund of over US$940,000 and interest were separate. The first container had quality issues; two more were not delivered. Link contracts, payments, quality objections and loss records. Later proceedings and collection are unverified. Contact Comply about your China-related dispute. #USProcurement #ChinaSourcing #MedicalGloves #CrossBorderContracts #Comply https://www.uncitral.org/res/clout/clout/data/chn/clout_case__html/CHN_16052023_FT.pdf Illustrative footage; not case products or representation. Music: Cipher — Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com), CC BY 4.0. Excerpt; mix adjusted. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

A U.S. buyer sues in China: nearly US$20,000 in first-instance damages Can a U.S. buyer bring a supply-contract claim in China? In Shaphargroup’s medical-glove dispute, Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People’s Court awarded nearly US$20,000 in actual damages at first instance in May 2023. A refund of over US$940,000 and interest were separate. The dispute involved quality issues with the first container and two further containers that were not delivered. For U.S. procurement teams, connect the contract, payments, quality objections and loss records. Separate money paid for the goods from additional damages. Later proceedings and collection have not been verified. Contact Comply to discuss your China-related dispute and coordinate next steps with counsel. #USProcurement #ChinaSourcing #MedicalGloves #CrossBorderContracts #Comply Case: Shaphargroup LLC v. Baiki Holdings (China), Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People’s Court, (2022) Jing 04 Min Chu 294, May 16, 2023. First instance; later proceedings and collection unverified. Original: https://www.uncitral.org/res/clout/clout/data/chn/clout_case__html/CHN_16052023_FT.pdf Music: Cipher by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com), ISRC USUAN1100844. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Public case commentary; not a claim that our office represented the parties. Generic glove and third-party office footage do not depict the goods or office in this case.

A U.S. buyer sues in China: nearly US$20,000 in first-instance damages Can a U.S. buyer bring a supply-contract claim in China? In Shaphargroup’s medical-glove dispute, Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People’s Court awarded nearly US$20,000 in actual damages at first instance in May 2023. A refund of over US$940,000 and interest were separate. The dispute involved quality issues with the first container and two further containers that were not delivered. For U.S. procurement teams, connect the contract, payments, quality objections and loss records. Separate money paid for the goods from additional damages. Later proceedings and collection have not been verified. Contact Comply to discuss your China-related dispute and coordinate next steps with counsel. #USProcurement #ChinaSourcing #MedicalGloves #CrossBorderContracts #Comply Case: Shaphargroup LLC v. Baiki Holdings (China), Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People’s Court, (2022) Jing 04 Min Chu 294, May 16, 2023. First instance; later proceedings and collection unverified. Original: https://www.uncitral.org/res/clout/clout/data/chn/clout_case__html/CHN_16052023_FT.pdf Music: Cipher by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com), ISRC USUAN1100844. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Public case commentary; not a claim that our office represented the parties. Generic glove and third-party office footage do not depict the goods or office in this case.