A rejected shipment does not make every later loss the supplier’s responsibility. In Hang Tat’s frozen-shrimp dispute, a U.S. buyer paid over US$100,000 before the goods were refused entry and returned to China. In December 1999, the Rizhao court awarded over US$110,000 in refund and expenses, plus about US$3,400 in lost-profit damages. The buyer also bore 70% of the returned goods’ loss in value for failing to take reasonable preservation measures. After setoff, net principal was about US$57,000. Interest was separate and calculated on a different principal under the judgment. Preserve the contract, rejection and shipping records, and evidence of steps taken to limit losses. This is a historical first-instance decision; later proceedings and collection remain unverified. Contact Comply to discuss your China-related dispute and coordinate next steps with counsel. #CrossBorderContracts #USImporters #SeafoodTrade #SupplyChain #Comply Historical first-instance judgment based on the published English translation; later proceedings and actual recovery are unverified. The translation’s narrative and disposition differ by US$0.42 on profits; the amount above follows the disposition. Generic footage does not depict the goods or location in this case. Training footage uses new narration. Source: https://www.unilex.info/cisg/case/1029 Case: Ri Jingchuzi No.29 (1997) Music: Cipher — Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Single continuous excerpt, volume/EQ adjusted under narration.

Shrimp dispute After a U.S. buyer’s shrimp shipment was returned to China, a 1999 first-instance judgment awarded over US$110,000 in refund and expenses, plus about US$3,400 lost profits. The buyer bore 70% of the goods’ value loss for inadequate preservation. Net principal was about US$57,000; interest used a different principal. Based on a historical translation; later proceedings and collection are unverified. Preserve evidence and limit losses. Contact Comply about your China-related dispute. #CrossBorderContracts #USImporters #SeafoodTrade #SupplyChain #Comply https://www.unilex.info/cisg/case/1029 Illustrative footage; not case products or representation. Music: Cipher — Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com), CC BY 4.0. Excerpt; mix adjusted. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Shrimp dispute After a U.S. buyer’s shrimp shipment was returned to China, a 1999 first-instance judgment awarded over US$110,000 in refund and expenses, plus about US$3,400 lost profits. The buyer bore 70% of the goods’ value loss for inadequate preservation. Net principal was about US$57,000; interest used a different principal. Based on a historical translation; later proceedings and collection are unverified. Preserve evidence and limit losses. Contact Comply about your China-related dispute. #CrossBorderContracts #USImporters #SeafoodTrade #SupplyChain #Comply https://www.unilex.info/cisg/case/1029 Illustrative footage; not case products or representation. Music: Cipher — Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com), CC BY 4.0. Excerpt; mix adjusted. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Shrimp dispute After a U.S. buyer’s shrimp shipment was returned to China, a 1999 first-instance judgment awarded over US$110,000 in refund and expenses, plus about US$3,400 lost profits. The buyer bore 70% of the goods’ value loss for inadequate preservation. Net principal was about US$57,000; interest used a different principal. Based on a historical translation; later proceedings and collection are unverified. Preserve evidence and limit losses. Contact Comply about your China-related dispute. #CrossBorderContracts #USImporters #SeafoodTrade #SupplyChain #Comply https://www.unilex.info/cisg/case/1029 Illustrative footage; not case products or representation. Music: Cipher — Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com), CC BY 4.0. Excerpt; mix adjusted. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Rejected shrimp: why was net principal about US$57,000? A rejected shipment does not make every later loss the supplier’s responsibility. In Hang Tat’s frozen-shrimp dispute, a U.S. buyer paid over US$100,000 before the goods were refused entry and returned to China. In December 1999, the Rizhao court awarded over US$110,000 in refund and expenses, plus about US$3,400 in lost-profit damages. The buyer also bore 70% of the returned goods’ loss in value for failing to take reasonable preservation measures. After setoff, net principal was about US$57,000. Interest was separate and calculated on a different principal under the judgment. Preserve the contract, rejection and shipping records, and evidence of steps taken to limit losses. This is a historical first-instance decision; later proceedings and collection remain unverified. Contact Comply to discuss your China-related dispute and coordinate next steps with counsel. #CrossBorderContracts #USImporters #SeafoodTrade #SupplyChain #Comply Historical first-instance judgment based on the published English translation; later proceedings and actual recovery are unverified. The translation’s narrative and disposition differ by US$0.42 on profits; the amount above follows the disposition. Generic footage does not depict the goods or location in this case. Training footage uses new narration. Source: https://www.unilex.info/cisg/case/1029 Case: Ri Jingchuzi No.29 (1997) Music: Cipher — Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Single continuous excerpt, volume/EQ adjusted under narration.

Rejected shrimp: why was net principal about US$57,000? A rejected shipment does not make every later loss the supplier’s responsibility. In Hang Tat’s frozen-shrimp dispute, a U.S. buyer paid over US$100,000 before the goods were refused entry and returned to China. In December 1999, the Rizhao court awarded over US$110,000 in refund and expenses, plus about US$3,400 in lost-profit damages. The buyer also bore 70% of the returned goods’ loss in value for failing to take reasonable preservation measures. After setoff, net principal was about US$57,000. Interest was separate and calculated on a different principal under the judgment. Preserve the contract, rejection and shipping records, and evidence of steps taken to limit losses. This is a historical first-instance decision; later proceedings and collection remain unverified. Contact Comply to discuss your China-related dispute and coordinate next steps with counsel. #CrossBorderContracts #USImporters #SeafoodTrade #SupplyChain #Comply Historical first-instance judgment based on the published English translation; later proceedings and actual recovery are unverified. The translation’s narrative and disposition differ by US$0.42 on profits; the amount above follows the disposition. Generic footage does not depict the goods or location in this case. Training footage uses new narration. Source: https://www.unilex.info/cisg/case/1029 Case: Ri Jingchuzi No.29 (1997) Music: Cipher — Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Single continuous excerpt, volume/EQ adjusted under narration.